
Andrej Karpathy built a thing called HackerTube - YouTube, but assembled only from videos recommended on Hacker News. No algorithm. No autoplay kittens. Just what real developers found worth linking in a thread. The news spread through tech circles within a day. Most people read it, hit like, moved on. But you could use it as a reason to message five people, get three replies, and one connection that actually goes somewhere.
Why HackerTube is a solid conversation opener, not a weird one
Networking usually dies in the first sentence. 'Hi, I'm looking for a job and wanted to connect' isn't a conversation opener, it's a request. The other person immediately thinks: what do I get from this. But if you write about something specific that both of you know or would want to discuss, that's different. HackerTube works as a topic because it's easy to explain, it touches something most developers actually use (YouTube and HN), and it opens a real conversation about how we consume technical content. Not news for the sake of news. An entry point.
Who in your network will actually respond
Before messaging anyone, spend thirty seconds thinking about who this actually interests. Messaging everyone at once is just spam with a human face. HackerTube resonates with specific profiles:
- Developers who post or read HN regularly - they're already in the loop and may have opinions on curation quality
- People who write tech blogs or make videos - for them it's a topic about attention distribution and what's actually worth watching
- Engineering managers and team leads - they often think about keeping teams up to date without noise
- Karpathy fans - there are a lot of them in ML and AI, he's a recognized name
If a person doesn't fit any of these - don't write about HackerTube. Find a different entry point. Matching the topic to the person matters more than the topic itself.
Specific scenarios: what to write and to whom
Below are four templates. Don't copy word for word. Adapt to your situation and voice. If you write it exactly as here, it will sound like a template.
Scenario 1. Recruiter or hiring manager at an AI/ML company
"Saw that Karpathy launched HackerTube - YouTube built from videos recommended on HN. Interesting take on filtering technical noise. Does your team have any approach to what's worth watching or reading? I'm asking because I'm thinking through how to structure learning while job searching."
Scenario 2. Developer you met at a conference or in a Telegram chat
"Hey, you read HN a lot - seen HackerTube from Karpathy? It's like YouTube but only videos from HN threads. I went in and lost an hour. There's [specific video title that got your attention]. Do you watch that kind of content or mostly stick to text?"
Scenario 3. LinkedIn cold outreach to someone at a company you're targeting
"Came across your article on [topic from their post] - then landed on Karpathy's HackerTube, which has a video on a similar topic from HN. The community itself acts as curator - weird but effective idea. Do you follow what comes out of the HN space? I'm actively studying [technology/domain] and curious how [role] at your company approaches that area."
Scenario 4. Former colleague you haven't talked to in a while
"Hey, it's been a while. Saw HackerTube today - YouTube built from HN recommendations, Karpathy's project. Immediately thought of you because you always shared good videos in Slack. How are things, what are you up to now?"
Before messaging anyone - actually go to HackerTube and watch at least one video. Having a specific reaction to a specific video makes your message ten times more alive. 'There's a video about how Stripe built their API - watched it and realized I'd never thought about versioning that way' - that's already a conversation, not just a topic.
How to turn it into a conversation about work (without the lunge)
Okay, the person replied. You talked about HackerTube. What now? Most people either drop the conversation here or pivot hard: 'by the way, I'm looking for a job.' Both are bad moves. First is a missed opportunity. Second feels like they were used as a pretext, not talked to as a person.
The right approach is to let the conversation breathe for one or two exchanges, then transition naturally through context. Here's how that can look:
- 1First message: HackerTube as the topic, question about their experience or opinion
- 2Reply came in: engage with the substance, add your own observation
- 3Your second message: 'I'm actively following this kind of content because I'm moving into [direction] / looking for my next step in [domain]. Have you worked at companies where this is used seriously?'
- 4If the person is open - you can say directly that you're looking. If not - just continue the conversation. The contact is worth more than one ask.
HackerTube as a talking point in interviews
A separate angle: using this not in networking, but in the interview itself. The question 'how do you stay current with the industry' is one of the most boring ones out there. And the answers usually are too: 'I read Medium, follow Twitter.' Nobody finds that interesting. But if you say: 'I recently found HackerTube - YouTube built from videos recommended on Hacker News. The idea is simple but the logic behind it is interesting: the HN community is very selective, so videos there are rarely shallow. I found [specific video] and it genuinely changed how I think about [specific topic]' - that's not an answer, that's a conversation.
If you're preparing for a specific interview and want to practice this answer so it sounds live, not rehearsed - the AI Coach in Trackr can play the interviewer and give you feedback on whether your answer sounds organic or like you're reading from a script.
What to track so nothing gets lost
Networking through news has one problem: you write to five people, two reply, one conversation goes somewhere concrete - and then you can't remember who said what or when to follow up. If you're doing any kind of active job search, these touch points add up to dozens.
In Trackr the 14-stage Kanban tracks applications, but you can also add contacts with notes: what you talked about, what you promised to send, when to follow up. Not for bureaucracy, but so you don't look like the person who writes a week later: 'remind me, we talked about some YouTube thing right?'
- Contact name and where you met or found them
- Topic that started the conversation (in this case - HackerTube)
- Status: messaged / replied / agreed to talk / dead end
- Next action and date - so you don't forget and don't message too soon
Don't chase message volume. Five targeted messages with a real connection to the person beats thirty 'hey, saw the news' blasts. LinkedIn and Telegram algorithms notice mass messaging. People do too.
In short: what to do right now
HackerTube won't be the week's news forever. The 'just saw this' window is a few days. After that it's just another tool and messaging about it reads as late. If you want to use it - do it now.
- 1Go to HackerTube (link is on Karpathy's blog: karpathy.bearblog.dev/hacker-tube) and actually watch at least one video to the end
- 2Write down what got your attention - one sentence, in your own words
- 3Think of three people in your LinkedIn or Telegram who would genuinely find this interesting
- 4Write to each person separately, adapted to their context. Not one message to three people.
- 5Add the contacts to your tracker and set a follow-up reminder for 5-7 days out
Organise your job search with Trackr
Track applications, analyse your CV with AI, and prepare for interviews - free.
Get started free

